Re: Election Fraud 2000

On Tue, 02 Dec 2003 19:33:37 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Desertphile) wrote:

>On 1 Dec 2003 17:33:04 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Steve) wrote:
>
>> You are afraid of Democracy. You would rather close your eyes
>> and pretend it's not happening. You have no argument against this
>> exposure. Do you benefit from the fraud? Maybe that's the answer.
>> Remember voter fraud works both ways.
>
>Some people, for whatever reasons, wish to ignore the fact that voting
>machines in Florida were tampered with during the year 2000 elections.
>After _The_Washington_Post_ published its findings, the Diebold memos
>were "hacked" and published widely across the internet. The memos show
>the company's bewilderment concerning how easily their machines were
>fooled into subtracting 16,022 votes from Gore in one precinct, and
>subtracting 5,000 votes from Gore in another. It is the job of Bush2-
>appointed law enforcement to investigate the voting fraud, so it is
>very unlikely anything will be done until Bush2 is out of the Oval
>Office and competent people take over.
>
>I've read that Diebold has dropped most of its law suits against the
>people who posted Diebold's memos. They will likely never find the
>person who hacked into their computers and stole the memos.
>
>> Stevel

Q.: Why didn't Gore want to count all the ballots of the State?

A: Because Democrats are accustomed to committing voter fraud and have
never been called to task before.

The Sore Loserman 2000 party still lives (just barely).

Strider