Re: Election Fraud 2000

"False Document" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Mark Cook" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> > "False Document" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> "Mark Cook" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
> >> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> >>
> >> > "Desertphile" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> >> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >> On 1 Dec 2003 17:33:04 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Steve) wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> > You are afraid of Democracy. You would rather close your eyes
> >> >> > and pretend it's not happening. You have no argument against
> >> >> > this exposure. Do you benefit from the fraud? Maybe that's the
> >> >> > answer. Remember voter fraud works both ways.
> >> >>
> >> >> Some people, for whatever reasons, wish to ignore the fact that
> >> >> voting machines in Florida were tampered with during the year 2000
> >> >> elections. After _The_Washington_Post_ published its findings, the
> >> >> Diebold memos were "hacked" and published widely across the
> >> >> internet. The memos show the company's bewilderment concerning how
> >> >> easily their machines were fooled into subtracting 16,022 votes
> >> >> from Gore in one precinct, and subtracting 5,000 votes from Gore
> >> >> in another. It is the job of Bush2- appointed law enforcement to
> >> >> investigate the voting fraud, so it is very unlikely anything will
> >> >> be done until Bush2 is out of the Oval Office and competent people
> >> >> take over.
> >> >
> >> > This was in Volusia County. http://www.blackboxvoting.org/
> >> >
> >> >  Please explain one simple fact, in Volusia County, when the manual
> >> >  recount
> >> > took place, why didn't Gore's total increase by 21,022 votes?
> >> >
> >> Because the manual recount only recounted hard-copy ballots. The GES
> >> machines didn't leave a paper trail (and still don't). There is
> >> nothing to recount either manually or otherwise. You plug in a memory
> >> card to a counting computer - you get a number for each candidate.
> >> You plug in second card, one candidate loses 16K votes, and poof -
> >> what can you do? Well, other than make sure as many people as
> >> possible are using those same machines 4 years later.
> >
> > Please explain the system. Volusia uses optical scan ballots. What
> > happens to the ballots after they are scanned?
> >
> You're right - my bad. They actually did recount at least 3/4 of those OS
> ballots. I believe the recounted totals are included in the certified
> total for Volusia. It's the newer machines Diebold is making that use
> touch-screen voting and do not produce a paper trail. Imagine - machines
> that do produce paper trails are so vulnerable - how much fraud will
> there be with no paper trail?

I agree, I am not sure if I like that idea at all.


> "Anybody who wants to harm American troops will be found and brought to
> justice. There are some that feel like if they attack us that we may
> decide to leave prematurely. They don't understand what they are talking
> about if that is the case. Let me finish. There are some who feel like
> the conditions are such that they can attack us there. My answer is,
> bring 'em on."
>
>    - George WMD Bush, July 2, 2003
>
> And they did. Impeach Bush NOW!!! Before more young kids die.