Re: Election Fraud 2000

"Mark Cook" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: 

> "False Document" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> "Mark Cook" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
>> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>>
>> > "Desertphile" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> On 1 Dec 2003 17:33:04 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Steve) wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > You are afraid of Democracy. You would rather close your eyes
>> >> > and pretend it's not happening. You have no argument against
>> >> > this exposure. Do you benefit from the fraud? Maybe that's the
>> >> > answer. Remember voter fraud works both ways.
>> >>
>> >> Some people, for whatever reasons, wish to ignore the fact that
>> >> voting machines in Florida were tampered with during the year 2000
>> >> elections. After _The_Washington_Post_ published its findings, the
>> >> Diebold memos were "hacked" and published widely across the
>> >> internet. The memos show the company's bewilderment concerning how
>> >> easily their machines were fooled into subtracting 16,022 votes
>> >> from Gore in one precinct, and subtracting 5,000 votes from Gore
>> >> in another. It is the job of Bush2- appointed law enforcement to
>> >> investigate the voting fraud, so it is very unlikely anything will
>> >> be done until Bush2 is out of the Oval Office and competent people
>> >> take over. 
>> >
>> > This was in Volusia County. http://www.blackboxvoting.org/
>> >
>> >  Please explain one simple fact, in Volusia County, when the manual
>> >  recount
>> > took place, why didn't Gore's total increase by 21,022 votes?
>> >
>> Because the manual recount only recounted hard-copy ballots. The GES
>> machines didn't leave a paper trail (and still don't). There is
>> nothing to recount either manually or otherwise. You plug in a memory
>> card to a counting computer - you get a number for each candidate.
>> You plug in second card, one candidate loses 16K votes, and poof -
>> what can you do? Well, other than make sure as many people as
>> possible are using those same machines 4 years later.
> 
> Please explain the system. Volusia uses optical scan ballots. What
> happens to the ballots after they are scanned?
> 
You're right - my bad. They actually did recount at least 3/4 of those OS 
ballots. I believe the recounted totals are included in the certified 
total for Volusia. It's the newer machines Diebold is making that use 
touch-screen voting and do not produce a paper trail. Imagine - machines 
that do produce paper trails are so vulnerable - how much fraud will 
there be with no paper trail?
-- 
"Anybody who wants to harm American troops will be found and brought to
justice. There are some that feel like if they attack us that we may
decide to leave prematurely. They don't understand what they are talking
about if that is the case. Let me finish. There are some who feel like
the conditions are such that they can attack us there. My answer is,
bring 'em on." 

   - George WMD Bush, July 2, 2003

And they did. Impeach Bush NOW!!! Before more young kids die.