Usenet.com

www.Usenet.com

Group Index

Talk Thread Archive from Usenet.com

<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->

Re: Election Fraud 2000



"Desertphile" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On 1 Dec 2003 17:33:04 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Steve) wrote:
>
> > You are afraid of Democracy. You would rather close your eyes
> > and pretend it's not happening. You have no argument against this
> > exposure. Do you benefit from the fraud? Maybe that's the answer.
> > Remember voter fraud works both ways.
>
> Some people, for whatever reasons, wish to ignore the fact that voting
> machines in Florida were tampered with during the year 2000 elections.
> After _The_Washington_Post_ published its findings, the Diebold memos
> were "hacked" and published widely across the internet. The memos show
> the company's bewilderment concerning how easily their machines were
> fooled into subtracting 16,022 votes from Gore in one precinct, and
> subtracting 5,000 votes from Gore in another. It is the job of Bush2-
> appointed law enforcement to investigate the voting fraud, so it is
> very unlikely anything will be done until Bush2 is out of the Oval
> Office and competent people take over.

This was in Volusia County. http://www.blackboxvoting.org/

 Please explain one simple fact, in Volusia County, when the manual recount
took place, why didn't Gore's total increase by 21,022 votes?

> I've read that Diebold has dropped most of its law suits against the
> people who posted Diebold's memos. They will likely never find the
> person who hacked into their computers and stole the memos.
>
> > Stevel





<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->


Usenet.com



Please check out one of the premium Usenet Newsgroup Service Providers below for access to Usenet.