
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 09:42:53 -0800, "Dutch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >"ipse dixit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote >[..] > >> Now THAT could be true if you look at it the >> right way. I'm not Jon, and "firstoftwins" can >> vouch for that, but I could never guarantee you >> I'm not "just another character the Gonad >> is *playing.*", > >No, you're a sock-puppet of Derek Nash. > Evidence please! >> > Dutch doesn't think it is a benefit afaik. >> >> Yes, he does, > >No, I do not. > I've proved that you do by showing what you have conceded to. >> and these comments (below) prove it. > >No they do not.. > Which is why you snipped them away. Yeah right. >> He believes an animal benefits >> from getting to experience life and being >> able to reproduce after their predators have >> been removed by our moral consideration >> toward them. > >Deer populations benefit from removal of predators, just as human >populations benefit from removal of murderers. > That's not all you've said or admitted to. You have conceded, this very day in another thread to this, that animals benefit from getting to experience life AND from being able to reproduce. Check this beauty out; [start ipse dixit] >> The quotes and admissions below prove you >> believe an animal benefits from getting to >> experience life and being able to reproduce after >> their predators have been removed > >Of course they do. Way to go ...!!!!!!!! [end] >You ARE a stupid, lying, STUPID cocksucker. > Hitting a nerve, am I?
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |