Re: pearl's list update

On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 03:25:39 -0000, "pearl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

>"swamp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Mon, 1 Dec 2003 15:21:14 -0000, "pearl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
><..>
>> >Show where the math is 'bad', swamp, also where the data
>> >is 'misapplied and undocumented'.
>>
>> You came up w/ the wildly impossible figures. Fixing your calcs is
>> *your* job, not mine.
>
>Support your claims.

I have. You've got a minimum of 60 milliion calories *per head* of
cattle to account for. Find something wrong w/ my math. I
double-checked and my numbers work out fine.

[snip of bad math]

>> >> >Right?
>> >>
>> >> Wrong. Let's work backwards,
>
>No.  Address what I've posted first.  Then you can work
>backwards all you like.

On the contrary, address the problems w/ your math and then we'll
progress as you wish. Your numbers suggest mammals are extinct.

-- swamp