Re: Suspect's Attempt to Support His List Falls Short (Was Re: Blood Country - Texas shame)

Defender of the Flakes wrote:
> > > > > > (There are more threads with crop circle info, should anyone want to
> > > > > > review each individual thread and/or post.)
> > > > >
> > > > > How about some specific quotes?  It's not my job to
> > > > > read through volumes of verbiage to find them.  Quit shirking.
> > > >
> > > > I've no problem with suspect posting the truth, as I've stated it.
> > >
> > >
> > > That's what I figured.  You have enough controversial views that he
> > > could have posted a more accurate list and still had a decent number
> > > of items, if accuracy had been a concern for him.  But clearly it
> > > wasn't and it makes one wonder about Usual Suspect's lack of interest
> > > in being truthful.  It looks like a bad habit that he picked up from
> > > his newly found buddy, jonnie.
> >
> > I knew you'd wuss out when faced with the truth. ...
>
> What truth?  The main truth in evidence here is that you haven't
> been able to support a significant number of items on your list.

They're all documented, Sophist Boob.

> > ...You're the least
> > respectable person in these groups.
> >
> >
> > > BTW, I didn't know which items on the list were valid and which weren't.
> > > But I knew that jonnie and Usual Suspect were lying about some of
> > > them.  Thanks for clarifying it (in your other post).
> >
> > Which ones do you consider lies, ...
>
> See my post of last Wednesday evening.  Every one of
> your items that I indicated was undemonstrated, minus
> the ones that pearl has since accepted, are lies.

No. Those were all addressed elsewhere, including in Jon's response to you.

> > ... dickhead?

That epithet fits you. Be careful what you ask for next time, Boob. You 
wanted proof that the ditz is a flake, and you got it. Defend her at 
your own reputation's peril.