Re: Suspect's Attempt to Support His List Falls Short (Was Re: Blood Country - Texas shame)

"usual suspect" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>>>(There are more threads with crop circle info, should anyone want to
> >>>>review each individual thread and/or post.)
> >>>
> >>>How about some specific quotes?  It's not my job to
> >>>read through volumes of verbiage to find them.  Quit shirking.
> >>
> >>I've no problem with suspect posting the truth, as I've stated it.
> >
> >
> > That's what I figured.  You have enough controversial views that he
> > could have posted a more accurate list and still had a decent number
> > of items, if accuracy had been a concern for him.  But clearly it
> > wasn't and it makes one wonder about Usual Suspect's lack of interest
> > in being truthful.  It looks like a bad habit that he picked up from
> > his newly found buddy, jonnie.
>
> I knew you'd wuss out when faced with the truth. ...

What truth?  The main truth in evidence here is that you haven't
been able to support a significant number of items on your list.


> ...You're the least
> respectable person in these groups.
>
> > BTW, I didn't know which items on the list were valid and which weren't.
> > But I knew that jonnie and Usual Suspect were lying about some of
> > them.  Thanks for clarifying it (in your other post).
>
> Which ones do you consider lies, ...

See my post of last Wednesday evening.  Every one of
your items that I indicated was undemonstrated, minus
the ones that pearl has since accepted, are lies.


> ... dickhead?

"Address the issues at hand, not your hatred of me.
..
.. the issue at hand isn't me. ..  Stick to the issue."
-'usual suspect' 31/Oct/03

"Perhaps you'd feel better if you dealt with the
issues rather than attack the character of others."
-'usual suspect' 3/Nov/03

"Attacking the person, yet another cheesy fallacy of
debate and argumentation." -'usual suspect' 9/Nov/03