Re: Way to go, Dutch - you just made Fuckwit's argument for him.

"ipse dixit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> On Mon, 1 Dec 2003 12:11:51 -0800, "Dutch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >"ipse dixit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> >> On Mon, 1 Dec 2003 11:14:29 -0800, "Dutch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >"ipse dixit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> >> >> On Mon, 1 Dec 2003 10:56:43 -0800, "Dutch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> >> You do accept Harrison's argument,
> >> >> >
> >> >> >No, I reject his argument now, as I have for two years.
> >> >> >
> >> >> That's clearly a lie, even though you snipped
> >> >> the evidence away which proves it.
> >> >
> >> >There's no evidence that "proves it", it's false.
> >> >
> >> The evidence you keep snipping away does
> >> prove you support harrison's argument because
> >> it's from your own hand.
> >
> >It's an absurd claim that cannot be supported by objective evidence.
>
> I've supplied the evidence several times now,

You're an idiot. You're arguing that *I* believe in a view that I have
argued against consistently for an extended period.

You must love lost cause arguments.