Re: Way to go, Dutch - you just made Fuckwit's argument for him.

On Mon, 1 Dec 2003 11:14:29 -0800, "Dutch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>"ipse dixit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
>> On Mon, 1 Dec 2003 10:56:43 -0800, "Dutch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> >> You do accept Harrison's argument,
>> >
>> >No, I reject his argument now, as I have for two years.
>> >
>> That's clearly a lie, even though you snipped
>> the evidence away which proves it.
>
>There's no evidence that "proves it", it's false.
>
The evidence you keep snipping away does 
prove you support harrison's argument because
it's from your own hand.

<unsnip>
You do accept Harrison's argument, and this is
shown in the threads you've been cutting and
running from.

[start ipse dixit]
>> >> You wrote that, "The deer benefit from 
>> >> the loss of predators, *first* because they
>> >> are able to reproduce prodigiously...", so the
>> >> benefits you're referring to are;
>> >> 1) from living
>> >> 2) from producing
>> >> after we have removed their predators, so explain
>> >> how.
>> >>
>> Well, Dutch?
>
>It's self-evident, you're an idiot.
>
Way to go ...
[end]

> [ipse dixit]
> Then explain how they benefit;
> 1) from living
> 2) from producing
[Dutch]
It's self-evident
[end]

You've also claimed, as Harrison does, that it's
a moral consideration issue.

"I have said this is a "moral consideration" issue."
Dutch 2003-11-28

Way to go ...
<end>