Re: Election Fraud 2000

On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 16:57:45 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Desertphile) wrote:

>On Sun, 30 Nov 2003 22:14:24 GMT, Strider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 30 Nov 2003 21:15:35 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> (Desertphile) wrote:
>
>> >A Brief History of Computerized Election Fraud in America
>> >By Victoria Collier
>
>> You don't know the difference between a verifiable cite and editorial
>> piece, do you?
>
>
>Please do not attribute your intellectual failings to me.
>


Geeze..you must have been carrying this hardon for a very long time.
Most of the links cited below, are either dead, or blogs, or cites
from the media at the time, long before there was any final
resolution.   The very few that were active were from AntiBush
sources, and none of them had any verifyable data, just supposition.

Now about your intellectual failings....
They appear to be widespread and numerous.

Gunner

>
>
>http://orlandosentinel.com/news/1109vol.htm
>
>http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/daily/detail/0,1136,36000000000124832,00.html
>
>http://www.nypress.com/16/46/news&columns/rotation.cfm
>
>http://www.everyweek.com/News/News.asp?no=3670
>
>Washington Post Sunday November 12, 2000 Page 22A
>
>Miami Herald Tuesday, November 27, 2001 (Published Thursday, April 5,
>2001) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>http://www.scoop.co.nz/mason/stories/HL0310/S00211.htm
>
>http://www.newsfrombabylon.com/article.php?sid=1191
>Quietly, Florida Admits 2000 Election Fraud
>
>http://www.courier-journal.com/localnews/2003/10/18ky/met-front-state1018-7203.html
>
>http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/ap/20001110/el/eln_florida_recount_63.html
>
>http://www.herald.com/thispage.htm?content/archive/news/yahoo/digdocs/058333
>
>http://www.latimes.com/news/comment/20001110/t000107677.html
>
>http://www.salon.com/politics/feature/2000/11/07/results/
>
>http://www.miamiherald.com/content/archive/news/elect2000/digdocs/095052.htm
>
>http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20001108/pl/election_naacp_dc_2.html
>
>http://www.herald.com/content/today/docs/067127.htm
>
>http://www.sptimes.com/News/110900/Election2000/Voters_statewide_say_.shtml
>
>http://abcnews.go.com/sections/politics/DailyNews/ELECTION_WatchdogPart5001108.html.html
>
>http://www.apbnews.com/newscenter/breakingnews/2000/11/08/vote1108_01.html
>
>http://www.motherjones.com/news_wire/floridavote.html
>
>http://cnews.tribune.com/news/story/0,1162,oso-nation-82375,00.html
>
>http://cnews.tribune.com/news/story/0,1162,sunsentinel-elections2000-82375,00.html
>
>http://www.sptimes.com/News/110900/Election2000/Voters_statewide_say_.shtml
>
>http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/daily/detail/0,1136,36000000000124144,00.html
>
>http://www.herald.com/content/today/docs/098048.htm
>
>http://cnews.tribune.com/news/story/0,1162,oso-nation-82375,00.html
>
>http://www.nytimes.com/2000/11/11/politics/11BLAC.html
>
>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A61032-2000Nov10.html
>
>http://www.pensacolanewsjournal.com/news/110900/Local/ST001.shtml

"No man shall be debarred the use of arms.
The laws that forbid the carrying of arms disarm those only who are neither
inclined nor determined to commit crimes.
Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants.
They ought to be designated as laws not preventative but fearful of crimes,
produced by the tumultuous impression of a few isolated facts, and not by 
thoughtful consideration of the inconveniences and advantages of a universal decree."
 - Thomas Jefferson