
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Jonathan Ball" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > rick etter wrote: > > > "Rat & Swan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > >>You have such a blind hatred of vegetarians you don't even hear what > >>they are saying. If one is concerned about the environment, it is > >>important to talk about ways humans _in general_ can work to lessen > >>their destructive impact. > > > > ==================== > > Not when crouched with the veganism that he is supporting. Self suffeciency > > by hunting and fishing is the most environmentally friendly way to live ones > > life. > > Quite possibly true, although to be complete, you need > to specify old-fashioned fruit-nut-vegetable foraging > as well. ======================= True, but in the discussion, he had already said he grows a large garden, and the hunting I reffered him to was to replace the calories he bought from store produce. That's why I left out the gathering stuff, because he was already giving that somewhat of a go. > > Face it, though: everyone can't do that, for obvious > reasons. > > > That you and the rst of the vegan hypocrites fail to see that is a > > problem of your religious dogma. > > > > > >> What Andrew says is correct: hunting is NOT > >> an answer to environmental destruction;neither is fishing. > > False. It is an answer. It just can't be the answer > for everyone. =================== That's what they always seem to want to turn to. It's the same with grass-fed, organic meats, "but can you feed the world that way" kind of crap when the focus is on how each individual themselves could do better. Since they are too lazy and convenience oriented, they have to resort to the generalizations... snippage...
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |