Re: If life is a benefit...

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> On Sun, 30 Nov 2003 18:18:15 GMT, Jonathan Ball <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >
> > > On Sat, 29 Nov 2003 18:01:58 GMT, ipse dixit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > If life is a benefit, then it's logically certain that
> > > no life [ie never existing at all] is a loss. 
> >
> > Right.  That's what Fuckwit, née David Harrison, 
> > believes.  It's what he MUST believe; 
>
>
>     We know it's not what I believe.

We know it IS what you believe; what you MUST believe, 
given the rest of the bullshit you write.

> > he has no choice, 
> > if he is to be logically consistent.  It explains this 
> > quote from Fuckwit:
> >
> >       Yes, it is the unborn animals that will be
> >       born if nothing prevents that from happening,
> >       that would experience the loss if their lives
> >       are prevented.
> >       Fuckwit - 08/01/2000