Re: Shooting Ourselves in the Foot

"Andrew Ward" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Dutch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > "Andrew Ward" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> >
> > > As I said at the very start of this thread, "I am not arguing either
> way"
> > > because my primary reasons for not using animals are environmental.
> >
> > Then you should be hunting and fishing, it is more environmentally
> friendly
>
> How can you say that about fishing. Do you have any idea what happens to
> the underwater environment when fish stocks get depleted?

Do you have any idea what happens to land when it's overused? It turns to a
barren dust bowl.  You could conceivably catch enough fish for your own use
if you live near the ocean, and you would very likely be having no greater
impact on the environment than with your purchases of shrink wrapped veggie
burgers.

Anyway, the topic here still is about this bullshit story about an imaginary
hunter who saw the light and wanted to stop harming animals.


> > than the large-scale monoculture farming that at least partially
supports
> > most vegan diets.
> >
> > [..]
> >
> > > My point is that I don't think humans have a clue about how ecosystems
> > > really work and it seems to me that the more we can leave them be then
> > > the better. The problem is that people do not notice gradual changes,
> > > if someone moved into my street these days they would probably think
> > > that the bay had always been like it is, lifeless and dirty.
> >
> > This is about a hunter who supposedly realized one day that his quarry
> were
> > living, breathing creatures, "saw the light", found compassion, quit
> > hunting, and went vegetarian. It was never about environmentalism.
> >
> > I'm more convinced than ever that the story is a fake. Making demons out
> of
> > all hunters is all too typical a routine for vegans and ARAs, anything
to
> > reinforce this us/them notion that supports their raging sanctimony.
> >
> >
>
>