Re: Way to go, Dutch - you just made Fuckwit's argument for him.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> On Sun, 30 Nov 2003 18:28:12 GMT, Jonathan Ball <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >
> > > On Sun, 30 Nov 2003 09:19:27 GMT, "Rubystars" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > "Jonathan Ball" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Sat, 29 Nov 2003 17:44:28 GMT, "Rubystars" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > > > > > <snip>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >  See if you can get anything out of this. If so, maybe we can go on
> > > > > > > > about it a little farther:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Nope, seemed like a bunch of gibberish. :(
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > -Rubystars
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >   Please share any superior beliefs that you have about the issue.
> > > > >
> > > > > Please share a well-founded, thought out belief in the
> > > > > first place, Fuckwit.
> > > >
> > > > I think it's less a belief and more of a fact that something that doesn't
> > > > exist yet can't make any claims on a right to exist.
> > >
> > >
> > >    Agreed. That was nothing.  Please share any superior
> >
> > Fuck you and "superior", Fuckwit.  You are demonstrably 
> > inferior, in every way.
>
>
>     LOL! If you were capable of contemplating the possibilities I feel
> sure it would be quite amusing Ball, but you can't, much less can
> you share them with others.

You do not have any special insight or superior 
perception, Fuckwit.  You do not understand things 
better than others here, and in fact, you understand 
them much worse.