
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"ta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote <snip> Ouch! No indication to whom you're responding? > > Perhaps "like other human supremacists from the Anti camp...." you > > can't resist trying to stick your opponents into neat little > > negative categories so you can (to use one of jonnie's favorite > > terms) marginalize them. Try dealing with Mason as an individual, > > not some stereotype you think he fits. > > Bingo. It's the Rush Limbaugh tactic . . . create a word or phrase that > neatly categorizes the negative elements of a particular group and keep > using that word or phrase over and over again until it sticks. It's handy > for people like Rush who lack the ability to counter the evidence with > intelligent responses - whenever someone disagrees with him, they get > dismissed as a "liberal". It's the same here, as you have pointed out. Don't > like a point of view? Well he must be a "leftist", or "liberal", or > "luddite", or "vegan" or . . . you get the drift. > > Unfortunately, these people lack the emotional intelligence to carry on a > civil discussion, which is why wasting time trying to be reasonable with > them is not an intelligent use of one's time. She neatly categorizes people with terms like "anti" and "meatarian", among others not to mention "human supremacists", I guess she lacks "emotional intelligence" too. Isn't "emotional retard" a pigeonhole you have just created?
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |