
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Sat, 29 Nov 2003 18:01:58 GMT, ipse dixit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If life is a benefit, then it's logically certain that > no life [ie never existing at all] is a loss. Why is deference to dualism logical? And what does "life is a benefit" mean to you in the first place? Scott
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |