Re: Way to go, Dutch - you just made Fuckwit's argument for him.

On Sat, 29 Nov 2003 19:18:07 GMT, "Rubystars" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>"Jonathan Ball" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Rubystars wrote:
>> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>> > <snip>
>> >
>> >>    See if you can get anything out of this. If so, maybe we can go on
>> >>about it a little farther:
>> >
>> >
>> > Nope, seemed like a bunch of gibberish. :(
>>
>> That shouldn't come as any surprise.  Fuckwit is an
>> extremely inarticulate, uneducated goof.  You may think
>> I'm merely being insulting, but I'm not.  I mean, I am
>> being insulting, but I'm not *merely* being insulting;
>> Fuckwit really is extremely inarticulate, and
>> uneducated.  I am quite certain he's a high school
>> drop-out.
>
>I still can't quite seem to understand how beings that don't 
>exist have any right to be conceived. 

He wants ARAs to view future unborn farm animals 
as rights holders, and that they are being "unfair" in 
wanting to prevent them from being born.

          What I'm saying is unfair for the animals that
          *could* get to live, is for people not to
          consider the fact that they are only keeping
          these animals from being killed, by keeping
          them from getting to live at all.
          David Harrison - 10/19/1999

And this statement ( below ) insists that my human 
rights don't trump the rights of unborn farm animals. 

          What gives you the right to want to deprive
          them [unborn animals] of having what life 
          they could have?
          David Harrison - 10/12/2001

He probably believes the Universe suffered a loss
prior to the big bang, too. I'm sure he does, and to
prove it I'll drag a full confession of this belief out 
of him by the end of next week.