Re: So, What IS a Fascist, anyway? Answer: nothing but a favorite swearword of leftists.

"Fredric L. Rice" wrote:
> 
> Gunner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> >On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 07:40:14 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fredric L.
> >Rice) wrote:
> >>Jonathan Ball <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>Tempest wrote:
> >>>> usual suspect wrote:
> >>>>>Rat & Swan wrote:
> >>>>>>But, in fact, that is very much what he is, although he doesn't see it
> >>>>>>himself (as you say, "fascist" has become a dirty word).  He took
> >>>>>>power by legal means, but without winning an election.
> >>>>>He won the election.
> >>>> Since when is being appointed by the Supreme Court winning an election?
> >>>He wasn't appointed by the Supreme Court.
> >>Sure he was, just as Hitler was appointed Chancelor.  The SC glibly decided
> >>that the will of the people was irrelevant and ordered the popular vote to
> >>be set aside.  The fascists racketeered in numerous States yet the coup in
> >>Florida was only possible thanks to the fact that the Bush fascists had
> >>stuffed the SC with fellow fascists working in a State that's run by
> >>another facist: the brother of the dictator.
> 
> >Interesting set of Lies. But typical of your ilk .
> 
> When you can point out anything in my brief summation of events offered
> above that's in any way inaccurate, wrong, or "sadly mistaken," you'll let
> me know, won't you, dear?

Yes there is one very glaring omission in your brief summation:
George Bush was Elevated to the president by the Electoral College
that met on December 14 to elect the president.  The supreme court
wasn't even in session.  The electoral college is made up 535 
electors, Each state is granted the number of electors equal to
its representatives in the house and the senate.  (This gives 
small population states, such as Wyoming, Montana, North and
South Dakota a disproportionate advantage. So much for your one
man one vote idea as one vote counts more in Wyoming than in 
California.).

The election of the electoral college when 270 for Bush and
264 for Gore If I remember right.  If 4 of the electors that
voted for Bush could have been persuaded to change their
votes because of voting irregularities then Gore would have
won by 1 vote.

(remember that investigation into voting irregularities cuts
both ways, as polls in heavily democratic areas of Missouri,
which were supposed to close at 8:00 PM by state law were 
ordered to stay open until 10:00 PM and voting irregularites
in place like Oregon (Vote by mail, where 1000's are registered
to vote in Washington, Multinomah and Clackamas counts at the
same time, (and there is not cross checking and these are the
democratic counties) with the rest of the state heavily
republican, (Bush lost oregon by 5000 votes most of them 
fraudulent, as well as may be a much as 2000 votes collected
at a Republican rally in Portland by unknown people (most likely 
democratic operatives) were never counted, and being that the
Governor, and Attorney General of Oregon are Democratic party
hacks no investigation was ever launched.  At any rate the whole
presidential election in Oregon ws so flawed  it should have 
been thrown out costing Gore 7 votes in the electoral college.



The Independent







> 
> Thank you so much in advance for your prompt assistance.
> 
> ---
> Yes, George W. Bush is an unelected baby killing fascist dictator.
> "In any country there must be people who have to die. They are
> the sacrifices any nation has to make to achieve law and order."
> - Idi Dada Amin, Bush's ideological and moral equal.