Re: Way to go, Dutch - you just made Fuckwit's argument for him.

On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 19:35:52 GMT, "Rubystars" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>"ipse dixit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 11:05:59 -0800, "Dutch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >"Rubystars" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >>
>> >> Let me get this straight. You both disagree 
>> >>with dh_ld. And you're arguing with each other 
>> >>about exactly how you disagree with him? Hilarious. :)
>> >
>> It does get better. Honest.
>>
>> >Derek makes a lot of silly arguments, he's an idiot.
>> >
>> "Thanks for your post Derek. That's the best response 
>> I've gotten so far. :)
>> I can tell you're being honest due to the fact that you 
>> used the reference and you admitted that most animals 
>> don't suffer that much."
>> Rubystars  Date: 2002-02-24
>
>Did I say something in 2002 you have a problem with? 

Your above response to Derek back in 2002 was to 
show Dutch he was wasting his time in trying to ruin
your opinion of Derek's honesty and good name.

>And why is it relevant now?
>
That'd be telling.