Re: Dreck forged a post under my name on August 17

"ipse dixit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 09:19:33 -0800, "Dutch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >"ipse dixit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> >> On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 09:37:27 -0800, "Dutch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> >"ipse dixit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> >> >> On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 11:16:47 -0800, "Dutch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >> >"ipse dixit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote \
> >> >> >> On Mon, 24 Nov 2003 23:21:10 -0800, "Dutch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >> >> >"ipse dixit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> >> >> >> >> On Mon, 24 Nov 2003 17:26:47 -0800, "Dutch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >"ipse dixit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> To summarise;
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >Yes lets..
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >> 1) You altered my posts to suit your argument
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >Another obvious lie, it is impossible to edit another
> >> >> >> >> >person's post.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>     "I altered your response ... I then reverted to being
> >> >> >> >>      completely honest and ethical in my replies"
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>      "I deliberately and obviously edited your post to
> >> >> >> >>        make a point, then I stopped."
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> You admitted you did, stupid.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >I was mistaken, it's impossible to edit another person's post
> >> >>
> >> >> The post I'm referring to is your reply where you
> >> >> altered my previous reply to suit your argument.
> >> >
> >> >I edited the included text in my post to make it appear that you had
> >> >something more truthful than you did. You ought to be grateful.
> >> >
> >> >>      "I altered your response ... I then reverted to being
> >> >>       completely honest and ethical in my replies"
> >> >>
> >> >>       "I deliberately and obviously edited your post to
> >> >>         make a point, then I stopped."
> >> >>
> >> >> You'll try absolutely ANYTHING to escape the fact
> >> >> that you have no excuse for altering your opponent's
> >> >> posts, and that's plain laughable considering the mass
> >> >> of evidence against you with your own admissions
> >> >> alongside it.
> >> >
> >> >So what?

<reinsert unnoted snip>
>From your behaviour I assumed that you approve of breaking the
rules to distort what one's opponent is saying.
</reinsert>

> Priceless!

Thank you for the perfect example again. You should shift your nym to "the
hypocrite". Make sure to try to pretend it's not you.