Re: So, What IS a Fascist, anyway? Answer: nothing but a favorite swearword of leftists.

"chicagofan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Mark Cook wrote:
>
> > "chicagofan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> >>Frivolous?  Republicans filed the first law suit; which eventually
> > resulted in
> >>the USSC effectively halting the ultimate *true* counts of all ballots.
> >
> >
> > 1) The first lawsuit was filed by DEMOCRATS, not Republicans.
>
> This lawsuit was filed by individual Florida citizens, not the Democratic
Party.

And that person was a Republican?


> > http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/election/suit1.pdf
> >   <>
> >
> >>Overriding the Florida State SC was/is reason enough for me to consider
> >>him the USSC *appointed* president.  Whether you and half the U.S.
consider
> >>him legally elected, matters not to me; he is NOT my president.  He
holds the
> >>office... period.
> >>bj
> >
> >
> > Cry me a river. Your candidate said, in arguments to the Florida Supreme
> > Court on 12/7/2000, that all ballots NEED NOT TO BE COUNTED, while the
Bush
> > campaign was arguing that a full recount was the only legal recount that
the
> > court could order. Why don't you blame Gore for not wanting to count the
> > ballots?
>
> The democrats changed their positions many times, as did the republicans,
and I
> agree the democrats made some colossal mistakes.  My quarrel is with the
USSC
> decision and the Florida courts; and anyone who contributed to stopping a
full
> recount, so everyone would know WHO won that state.  I would prefer to
know that
> Bush really won.
> bj

Then your quarrel is not with the USSC or the Bush campaign. The fact is
that Gore never filed for a full recount and the Democrat majority on the
FSC ignored the Bush campaign and ordered a partial recount (a recount that
was not supported by Florida Code).