Re: So, What IS a Fascist, anyway?

"Gunner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 01:43:12 GMT, "Jeff McCann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >"Jonathan Ball" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> >news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >[snip]
> >
> > You loser.
> >
> >Resorting to name-calling already?  Into the idiot file with ye' lad.
> >There's a good boy.
> >
> >Jeff
> >
> Ah...jeff..it appears he had your number..and in a fit of pique..you
> kill filed him as you had no response.
>
> Im rather surprised in you. Not for being so partisan and biased, or
> even for being in a state of denial..but for your
> neenerneederIneenerCantneenerHearneenerYouneener,
>
> Have a rough week?


No.  Once I saw that he conveniently ignored the fact that the riot in
Dade Co. was proven to have been organized by the Bush campaign and spun
off instead to the minor point of whether or not it was a "violent"
riot, and then also ignored his own unfounded implication that the Gore
campaign engaged in similar dirty tricks by first spinning into the more
vague "democrats" then into "the left" generally, added to his quick
resort to childishness, I realized that I was dealing with another
knee-jerk right wing nut case.  Since there's no point in debating such
idiots, I simply gave up.

I've already said that Bush legitimately won the election, although the
Supremes covered themselves in shame in the process.  That's the way it
goes.  However, it doesn't undo the facts of what occurred in Florida,
despite all the spin, then and now.  I may be "partisan and biased", or
even in a "state of denial," but the facts themselves are not.

Jeff