Re: Dreck forged a post under my name on August 17

On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 09:37:27 -0800, "Dutch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>"ipse dixit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
>> On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 11:16:47 -0800, "Dutch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >"ipse dixit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote \
>> >> On Mon, 24 Nov 2003 23:21:10 -0800, "Dutch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> >"ipse dixit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> >> On Mon, 24 Nov 2003 17:26:47 -0800, "Dutch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> >> >"ipse dixit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> To summarise;
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >Yes lets..
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> 1) You altered my posts to suit your argument
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >Another obvious lie, it is impossible to edit another 
>> >> >> >person's post.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>     "I altered your response ... I then reverted to being
>> >> >>      completely honest and ethical in my replies"
>> >> >>
>> >> >>      "I deliberately and obviously edited your post to
>> >> >>        make a point, then I stopped."
>> >> >>
>> >> You admitted you did, stupid.
>> >
>> >I was mistaken, it's impossible to edit another person's post
>>
>> The post I'm referring to is your reply where you
>> altered my previous reply to suit your argument.
>
>I edited the included text in my post to make it appear that you had
>something more truthful than you did. You ought to be grateful.
>
>>      "I altered your response ... I then reverted to being
>>       completely honest and ethical in my replies"
>>
>>       "I deliberately and obviously edited your post to
>>         make a point, then I stopped."
>>
>> You'll try absolutely ANYTHING to escape the fact
>> that you have no excuse for altering your opponent's
>> posts, and that's plain laughable considering the mass
>> of evidence against you with your own admissions
>> alongside it.
>
>So what? 

Priceless!