
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 07:57:08 GMT, Jonathan Ball <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Fredric L. Rice wrote: > >> Jonathan Ball <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >>>Tempest wrote: >>> >>>>usual suspect wrote: >>>> >>>>>Rat & Swan wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>But, in fact, that is very much what he is, although he doesn't see it >>>>>>himself (as you say, "fascist" has become a dirty word). He took >>>>>>power by legal means, but without winning an election. >>>>> >>>>>He won the election. >>>> >>>>Since when is being appointed by the Supreme Court winning an election? >> >> >>>He wasn't appointed by the Supreme Court. >> >> >> Sure he was, > >No, he wasn't. > >> just as Hitler was appointed Chancelor. > >Not at all like that. The U.S. Constitution doesn't >provide for an appointed executive. > >> The SC glibly decided >> that the will of the people was irrelevant and ordered the popular vote to >> be set aside. > >No, they didn't. That's flatly a lie. You are a liar. > >They ruled that the electoral provisions of the U.S. >Constitution were being subverted by the Democrats' >frivolous attempts to stall the Florida results. > >> The fascists > >"The word Fascism has now no meaning except in so far >as it signifies 'something not desirable.'" > >George Orwell >"Politics and the English Language", 1946 > >> racketeered in numerous States yet the coup in >> Florida was only possible thanks to the fact that the Bush fascists had >> stuffed the SC with fellow fascists working in a State that's run by >> another facist: the brother of the dictator. > >Good job, marginal. You've cemented your reputation as >a marginal, a zero, a null. Id rate him a minus. Gunner "The British attitude is to treat society like a game preserve where a certain percentage of the 'antelope' are expected to be eaten by the "lions". Christopher Morton
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |