
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"usual suspect" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
farrell77 wrote:
Yes, 26 for 26 is pretty fucking solid, if I say so myself.
Not if it's grossly inaccurate.
It isn't grossly inaccurate. ...
That's yet for you to show. I just posted my analysis of your defense for the list.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |