
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
I wish this guy could tell me why I spent many days a year on the seat of a D-2 cat pulling a grain drill on U.S. Forest Service land, planting crested wheat grass. After all it is grass that the cattle eat. If they don't have any grass they don't grow. If they have to walk all over creation to get proper nutrition the land can't carry the number of cattle the forest service says it should. Another New Yorker who is a big environmentalist but does't know squat about how cattle ranches really work. The Independent Offbreed wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fredric L. Rice) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > > > No, I favor setting aside and utilization plans that were drafted after > > the New Deal and the formation of the Conservation Corps. There's no > > good reason to subsidize less than 1% of the cattle industry that gets > > to graze on Federal lands that result in in growth of desert scrub and > > the loss of healthy ecosystems. > > The ecosstem needs a certain amount of grazing and browsing by a wide > variety of animals, not necessarily what it gets now. Cows, goats, and > sheep are adequate stand ins for the missing animals. > > If you disagree, then perhaps the horses and donkeys (also exotics) > should be all removed?
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |