Re: PETA's Ties to Terror

"drdoody" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
<snip>
> In fact, I'm sure that ELF/PETA terror tactics have probably already
> claimed their first innocent victims. I'mquite sure that whole the
> whole PETArd gaggle is busypatting their collective backs over
> shutting down some animal testing program somewhere, they never once
> stop to consider that the program in question was developing a new
> drug or technique to help treat people.

They don't care. They hate humans as the bane of all of nature. Our cities,
cars, eating habits, clothing, even our breath which exhales CO2, is blamed
for all the worlds problems.

They'd be much happier if whole continents had no human beings whatsoever on
them, and even happier if no continents had humans.

>You know, human beings.

The bane of all nature and goodness.

>The
> medicine that is delayed by PETAard idiocy is the medicine that
> doesn't help a single person. Of course, I'm sure that PETA could
> reallycare less about some kid somewhere in Kansas who dies in agony
> because a new medication that could have helped him is delayed by
> months due to their stupidity.

That makes them happy because I'm sure they feel that kid deserves to die
because he would've survived through "torturing and abusing animals, and
keeping them enslaved, and why should we have empathy for those who torture
and abuse animals."

>Their stock answer would be a
> combination of "Show me one instance." and "Computers can do it. Why
> do you need animals?". These are the typical responses of a
> quasi-terrorist group completely out of touch with reality and in dire
> need of destruction.

Computers can do some simulations, but not all of them. Animals do need to
be used still.

-Rubystars