Re: PETA's Ties to Terror

"Ray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> "usual suspect" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > From:
> > http://www.consumerfreedom.com/activistcash/org_blackeye.cfm?ORG_ID=21
> > ---------------
> > People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals provides aid and comfort for
> > the Earth Liberation Front (ELF) and the Animal Liberation Front (ALF).
> 
> Could be, but PETA do none of these things themselves.
> 
> ----------Snip--------------

Oh, well that makes everything so much better now. PETA doesn't bomb
buildings, it just assists an organization that does. So by that
rationale, Goering, Goebels, Hess and Eichmann were completely
innocent of any crime. It wasn't them who gassed and shot ten million
people. They didn't commit genocide. They didn't pull a single trigger
or drop a single canister of Zyklon.

ELF operates under the auspices of PETA. Of course there isn't any
direct link, PETArds might be stupid, but they aren't *that* stupid.
So when PETA funds an ELF operation, they can say: "Oh, we didn't
actually burn those buildings. That was ELF.".

Tell me, what happens when an ELF "operation" results in the death of
a sleeping vagrant or a firefighter? Will those be considered
collateral damage or acceptable losses in the plight for animal
rights? I don't care how carefully you case a target, when you set it
on fire or bomb it, there is *always* the chance that an innocent
person will die as a result. The truly firghtening thing is the fact
that PETA and ELF both continue their campaign of terror knowing this.
Eventually, a human being will die as a direct result of these idiots'
actions.

What then?

Doc