Re: Boycott CBS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

On Sun, 23 Nov 2003 21:17:07 GMT, William Cook
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>Gunner wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 23 Nov 2003 17:08:34 GMT, William Cook
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>>Gunner wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Sat, 22 Nov 2003 16:38:35 GMT, William Cook
>>>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>No, he didn't.  The most vibrant economic period in our 
>>>>>recent history came under your good pal Bill Clinton, 
>>>>>who presided over 8 uninterrupted years of economic 
>>>>>growth, saw unemployment fall to under 5% for the first 
>>>>>time in 40 years, whose administration eliminated the 
>>>>>federal budget deficit for the first time in over 30 
>>>>>years, who saw interest rates fall continually. 
>>>>>Reagan, by contrast, brought on the sharpest recession 
>>>>>in the post war period, although it may well have been 
>>>>>a corrective to the stagflation of the late 1970s.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Economics is not your strong suite, is it?
>>>
>>>Yes, actually, it is.  BA in economics, 1975; graduate 
>>>studies in economics, 1979-1982.
>>>
>>>
>>>>Clinton rode 7 yrs of the
>>>>Reagon boom,
>>>
>>>WHAT "Reagan boom", you fucking moron?  Do you not 
>>>remember the recession of 1990-91, the collapse of the 
>>>aerospace industry, the increasing umemployment rate?
>>>
>>>   The U.S. national unemployment rate was 5.3 percent
>>>   of all workers in April 1990 and 6.7 percent in
>>>   October 1991.
>>>
>>>What the fuck is the matter with you (other than your 
>>>partisan stupidity)?
>>>
>>>
>>>>only fucking the pooch himself and causing the current
>>>>recession which we are finally climbing out of.
>>>
>>>So did Bush senior "cause" the recession out of which 
>>>Clinton climbed?
>>>
>>>
>>>>Do your research a bit better Brainerd.
>>>
>>>Do ANY research at all, you gun-crazed fuck.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Seems your degree was wasted.
>
>Nope.  You should go get one.
>
>> 
>> Snicker
>> 
>> http://www.cato.org/pubs/pas/pa-261.html
>
>Lovely.  Also has NOTHING to do with your false claim: 
>  that Clinton rode a "Reagan boom".  The Reagan boom 
>was OVER when Clinton arrived in office.
>
>Your claim is false.  If you're going to insist on 
>sticking with it, that makes you a liar.

You ignored the previous post. Is there some reason for that? Need me
to post that one again?

Or are you lying by omission? Interesting. But then..you are a
Liberal, and by definition, a liar.

Gunner

"The British attitude is to treat society like a game preserve where a
certain percentage of the 'antelope' are expected to be eaten by the
"lions".
Christopher Morton