www.Usenet.com
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
On Sun, 23 Nov 2003 17:08:34 GMT, William Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Gunner wrote:
On Sat, 22 Nov 2003 16:38:35 GMT, William Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
No, he didn't. The most vibrant economic period in our recent history came under your good pal Bill Clinton, who presided over 8 uninterrupted years of economic growth, saw unemployment fall to under 5% for the first time in 40 years, whose administration eliminated the federal budget deficit for the first time in over 30 years, who saw interest rates fall continually. Reagan, by contrast, brought on the sharpest recession in the post war period, although it may well have been a corrective to the stagflation of the late 1970s.
Economics is not your strong suite, is it?
Yes, actually, it is. BA in economics, 1975; graduate studies in economics, 1979-1982.
Clinton rode 7 yrs of the Reagon boom,
WHAT "Reagan boom", you fucking moron? Do you not remember the recession of 1990-91, the collapse of the aerospace industry, the increasing umemployment rate?
The U.S. national unemployment rate was 5.3 percent of all workers in April 1990 and 6.7 percent in October 1991.
What the fuck is the matter with you (other than your partisan stupidity)?
only fucking the pooch himself and causing the current recession which we are finally climbing out of.
So did Bush senior "cause" the recession out of which Clinton climbed?
Do your research a bit better Brainerd.
Do ANY research at all, you gun-crazed fuck.
Seems your degree was wasted.
Snicker
http://www.cato.org/pubs/pas/pa-261.html
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
