Usenet.com

www.Usenet.com

Group Index

Talk Thread Archive from Usenet.com

<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->

Re: Feminoid-AR Nut: "Meat-loving tied to oppression"



Rat & Swan wrote:


Bill wrote:

Rat & Swan wrote:

Bill wrote:


<snip>


Not that this would surprise you, but the dogmatic leftist/collectivist carpet-muncher Karen Winter has long said that human use of animals and male brutality to women are intimately linked.


Where, Jonnie? Provide a quote.


It isn't a question of finding the single smoking large-caliber gun, you stupid bitch.


  Nice dodge, jonnie -- you _can't_ find a quote (since I don't
  believe what you say I do ), so you now claim you don't need one,
  you just KNOW.

Not mind-reading at all, stupid lying bitch; stitching together what you write, and arriving at a coherent conclusion about it.



   Fat is a feminist issue because of the relative
   powerlessness of women in our culture, as pedophilia
   is an issue because of the relative powerlessness of
   children in our culture.


http://tinyurl.com/w7q5


Which is true, in itself.

Which is NOT true. "Fat" is not a feminist issue.


"Powerlessness of women" is blamed in feminist ideology, to which you undeniably subscribe,


Ah, but what kind of feminist theory, jonnie?

Radical, hairy-armpit, man-as-oppressor theory.



on male oppression and brutality, just as the misuse of animals is.


  Humans are all in the misuse of animals together; it's nothing
  specifically male.  See Rubystars and Sue Bishop.

But then we find something much more forthright; no beating around the bush:


   >"is there a relationship between our God-talk and the
   >way we abuse animals? Is it possible that something
   >similar is occurring when we gender God as male and
   >ignore animals?"


IMO, without question.


Yes,

Yes. Yes, you conceive of animal "oppression" as a male problem, for which radical feminism is the answer.


You are wrong, right across the board.


http://tinyurl.com/w7qp


That is, in the opinion of Karen Winter, oppression of women by men and oppression of animals by humans are linked: men are bad.


Ridiculous. I don't think "Men are bad." I don't say "Men are bad."

We see that you think it, based on what you write.



You are so trivially easy to show to be a liar. When I say you believe something, it is so: I know you. Eventually, I will know you better than you know yourself.


No,

Yes.





<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->


Usenet.com



Please check out one of the premium Usenet Newsgroup Service Providers below for access to Usenet.