Re: Information

On Sat, 22 Nov 2003 13:24:30 -0500, "rick etter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>"ipse dixit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 18:46:57 GMT, frlpwr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >ipse dixit wrote:
>> >
>> >(snip)
>> >> >
>> >> The grass fed beef you claim to eat is protected
>> >> by programs such as the ADC, and besides that,
>> >> it has to be slaughtered, processed, stored and
>> >> distributed like any other foodstuff. Your claim,
>> >> that no animals die for you grass fed beef is absurd.
>> >
>> >Not only that, etter is in the Midwest.  There is not pasture available
>> >year round which means cattle are fed silage, cropped and cut earlier in
>> >the season.  Silage crops are cut low, remember the dead fawn Ball tried
>> >to assign to vegans.
>> >
>> Yes, I do. So, Rick's grass fed beef is protected
>> just like any other grazing animal and feeds on
>> silage which accrues ever more CDs because
>> the crop is cut low, eh? Priceless!
>=====================
>Nope.
>
It sure is, liar. 
>>
>> >Wherever feed is stored, rodent control is practiced.  Wherever
>> >slaughtering occurs, rodent control is practiced.  Wherever butchering
>> >occurs, rodent control is practiced.
>> >
>> Whoops. Poor Ricky.
>================
>nope.  None needed.  small time, quick clean-up.  too bad for you, again...
>
Your meat is like any other and accrues collateral 
deaths in the same way. As Jon reminded you;
"Sorry; that's an absurd claim.  You don't follow the
cattle around from birth to death to ensure that
NOTHING in the course of raising them causes other
animals to die.  Your claim is absurd on its face."
Jonathan Ball  2003-11-17