
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"ipse dixit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 17:35:07 -0500, "rick etter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > >"ipse dixit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> "rick etter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > "frlpwr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> > > There are massive numbers of collateral deaths > >> > > associated with livestock production, most of > >> > > them intentional. > >> > ======================= > >> > Name them. > >> > >> You've been shown the evidence many times > >> now, yet you still refuse to believe that livestock > >> production accrues collateral deaths. > >================== > >Nope. The livestock I eat sees none of that. Too bad for you, hypocrite... > > > Then you are in a very weak position to claim > collateral deaths accrue during the production > of any foods at all, let alone vegetables, and > you're crapping all over the likes of cowardly > Brandon, Swamp, Usual Suspect and Dutch > every time you make this stupid claim. ==== nope. > > > >snippage of your usual spew... > > > <unsnipped evidence showing the collateral > deaths associated with YOUR food> =============== nope snippage of usual spew.... repeating it doesn't make it so, killer.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |