Re: Webpage Responsibility.

"K D B" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Ray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> > The ongoing dispute between Derek Nash and Kevin Brandon is a clear cut
> > issue.
>
>   Yes it is, so why did you fuck it up?

The error is yours, not mine.
> >
> > The content of the text clearly states that the page is written by "Ward
> > Clark" and "Kevin Brandon." Therefore both authors share equal
> > responsibility for the content.
>
>   So, if I puy "Ray Slater" on a webpage, you would be responsible for
> the contents?

Only if I had previously agreed for my name to be used.


 You're an even bigger ifiot* than Dreck. If you had a
> brain, you'd know Dreck is playing games and doesn't even believe his
> own shit. He was just hoping for some fool to back him up. You're
> taking orders from Dreck, albeit indirectly.

Totally incorrect my posting was not sent as support for Derek.

If I had a brain and was "Trying" to make someone look a prat, I would check
my own posting for 'typos'.(2)

Are you saying that Clark forged your name?

Not so, this particular webpage clearly states that it is written by
Yourself and Ward Clark. That is clear for all to see.
> >
> >  In law,
>
>   Which you know nothing about, even in your own country; much less in
> the U.S.
 I know a little, but in law, a little knowledge can be dangerous and
expensive.

I am currently engaged in a legal dispute and in passing I ran this past my
solicitor. She gave me the info. (FOC)
>
>
>  both authors
>
>   That word does not accurately describe me.
I can think of one that does, but I am not here to insult you.
>
>
>  are responsible for the content. Therefore either
> > author is responsible for 100% of the content.
> >
> > That is not my opinion
>
>   Yes it is, and you pulled it out of your ass.

No, leave my bottom alone!
>
>
>  it is the Law.
>
>  Quit commrnting* on things you don't understand. That'll keep you
> silent forever.

As previously stated the info came from a legal source.
> >
> > I refuse to post to either party
>
>   Because you're a fucking liar who has no intention of supporting his
> bullshit.

My reasons for not posting to Derek are none of your concern
>
>
>
>  and therefore my comment is strictly
> > neutral.
>
>   Your comment is strictly shit.
At least it's neutral shit
But you confuse 'shit' with 'correct'.
> >
> > However, that does not stop me saying that the "Canned Gamehunter" and
self
> > appointed  "Gulf War Hero",  Ward Clark, is a liar and shitbag of the
lowest
> > order.
>
>   Then show where he appointed himself a "Gulf War Hero" so we can see
> who is lying.

At the time he posted on these groups he was known as 'Gulf War Hero' by the
many posters who hated the guy.
The 'self appointment' was, in this instace my mistake. I withdraw the
remark.

If we are to be strictly PC and you are still adamant that you are not
co-author of this garbage, I suggest you contact Clark and ask him to remove
your name from the webpage.Should you fail to undertake this action, or are
unwilling - you remain co-author.


No problem and certainly no need for abuse.

The reason I have previously refused to post to you is that I feel uneasy
with you attitude. To quote a recent remark made by one of our MPs " There
is something of the Night about you". I also find you a rather abusive and
common person.

You have done nothing to change my opinion - so that's your lot.
>