Re: Dutch shows his utter dishonesty and a penchant for altering his opponent's comments to suit.

"swamp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 06:50:33 GMT, "Ipse dixit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >"swamp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 11:01:17 GMT, "Ipse dixit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> >> >I don't edit my opponent's replies to suit my argument
> >> >> >or make posts using their identities. Those antics belong
> >> >> >to the anti side of these animal related groups.
> >> >>
> >> >> I'd say neither "side" has a monopoly on those antics,
> >> >
> >> >Then give an example where the AR side in these
> >> >animal related groups have forged posts using
> >> >their opponent's identity.
> >>
> >> You edit your opponent's replies to suit your argument on a regular
> >> basis, and this is one of them. You need to because your position is
> >> poor. Then there's "Pete" and "Malcolm" who've attempted to forge,
> >> incompetently.
> >
> >Right, you lying cunt, show where I have EVER forged
> >a post using "Pete" or Malcom's" identities.
>
> I didn't say you forged; I said you selectively editted which you've
> done once again. Thanks for another example. Pete and Malcolm are the
> incompetent forgers.

Show where, you fucking liar.