Re: Dutch shows his utter dishonesty and a penchant for altering his opponent's comments to suit.

On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 06:50:33 GMT, "Ipse dixit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

>
>"swamp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 11:01:17 GMT, "Ipse dixit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> >> >I don't edit my opponent's replies to suit my argument
>> >> >or make posts using their identities. Those antics belong
>> >> >to the anti side of these animal related groups.
>> >>
>> >> I'd say neither "side" has a monopoly on those antics,
>> >
>> >Then give an example where the AR side in these
>> >animal related groups have forged posts using
>> >their opponent's identity.
>>
>> You edit your opponent's replies to suit your argument on a regular
>> basis, and this is one of them. You need to because your position is
>> poor. Then there's "Pete" and "Malcolm" who've attempted to forge,
>> incompetently.
>
>Right, you lying cunt, show where I have EVER forged
>a post using "Pete" or Malcom's" identities.

I didn't say you forged; I said you selectively editted which you've
done once again. Thanks for another example. Pete and Malcolm are the
incompetent forgers. You're an incompetent editor.

Your grocery list...?

-- swamp