Re: Dutch shows his utter dishonesty and a penchant for altering his opponent's comments to suit.

On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 11:01:17 GMT, "Ipse dixit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

>
>"swamp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Sun, 16 Nov 2003 12:05:08 GMT, "Ipse dixit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >"rick etter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> "Ipse dixit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Even if your position could get any weaker, that
>> >> > > wouldn't have done it. It was obvious, it was never
>> >> > > intended to be anything but an obvious taking the
>> >> > > piss and you know it.
>> >> > >
>> >> > That's very easy to say after been shown your
>> >> > dishonesty, and I remember that Jonathan and
>> >> > Kevin tried a similar excuse to yours after being
>> >> > caught while forging posts using their opponent's
>> >> > identity. There is no excuse for editing your
>> >> > opponent's replies,
>> >> ========================
>> >> maybe you should follow your own advice there
>> >
>> >I don't edit my opponent's replies to suit my argument
>> >or make posts using their identities. Those antics belong
>> >to the anti side of these animal related groups.
>>
>> I'd say neither "side" has a monopoly on those antics,
>
>Then give an example where the AR side in these
>animal related groups have forged posts using
>their opponent's identity.

You edit your opponent's replies to suit your argument on a regular
basis, and this is one of them. You need to because your position is
poor. Then there's "Pete" and "Malcolm" who've attempted to forge,
incompetently. Then there's the nymshifters like yourself and "pearl."

>> however in this case I interpretted Dutch's response
>> as a barb, and not offered as an accurate description
>> of your grocery list.
>
>I don't care how you interpret it, Swamp.

And I don't care if you care how I interpret it, Derek. Can it be put
any more simply than that? Your argument is weak, which explains your
hesitance and desperation.

My grocery list:

1 gal. milk (homogenized, full fat)
6 tomatoes (romas in season, otherwise vinas)
2 lb ground chuck
1 lb hot italian sausage
1 8 oz. can tomato paste
1 28 oz. can pinto beans
1 28 oz. can kidney beans
2 15 oz, cans crushed tomatoes
2 onions (sweet in season)
4 carrots
6 eggs (free range [I pay the extra])
4 zucchini
2 potatoes (the big brown guys)
1 loaf wheat bread
1 12-pack Pacifico beer
18 oz. salsa fresca (mercado local, sabrosa)
1 8 oz. can El Pato Salsa Mexicana

I hate rice. Fried, Mexican, steamed, Chinese whatever. Not for ar/ev
reasons. Just don't like it.

>The fact is that Dutch edited my reply to a challenge
>he offered from this;
>
>"Fallen apples and mustard cress"
>
>to
>
>"Factory farmed rice, grains, fruits and vegetables
>purchased indiscriminately, coffee, tea, cheese,
>milk and eggs, along with some shit that I have no
>clue about"
>
>That's about as dishonest as you can get.

No, it wasn't, and you know full well it wasn't. Post your own list if
you're really feeling so aggrieved, and provide details as to how your
local farmer avoids CDs. Your avoidance of this issue is as dishonest
as one can get. Dutch was just giving you the business.

>> Your hesitance to reveal the true contents of the list, otoh, suggest
>> you're hiding something.
>>
>I have no desire to discuss my weekly grocery
>lists with the likes of you or Dutch.

The "likes of...? " Whatever you say, Ms. Dolittle.

>My answer was irrelevant

As usual...

>since I could've insisted I was
>fasting, for instance, and didn't have a grocery
>list to offer.

But you eat, and you know what you eat. This local farmer who assures
no CDs isn't flying either, as no farmer can make that guarantee. Pony
up.

>Dutch's editing of my list, whatever
>I chose to put in it, is a dishonest cheat on his
>part and shows his total lack of any honour or
>credibility.

Coming from someone w/ a history of dishonest editting your
credibility questioning is duly ignored. I trust Dutch's integrity
much more than yours.

-- swamp