Re: Dutch shows his utter dishonesty and a penchant for altering his opponent's comments to suit.

"Ipse dixit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "swamp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > On Sun, 16 Nov 2003 12:05:08 GMT, "Ipse dixit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >"rick etter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >> "Ipse dixit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Even if your position could get any weaker, that
> > >> > > wouldn't have done it. It was obvious, it was never
> > >> > > intended to be anything but an obvious taking the
> > >> > > piss and you know it.
> > >> > >
> > >> > That's very easy to say after been shown your
> > >> > dishonesty, and I remember that Jonathan and
> > >> > Kevin tried a similar excuse to yours after being
> > >> > caught while forging posts using their opponent's
> > >> > identity. There is no excuse for editing your
> > >> > opponent's replies,
> > >> ========================
> > >> maybe you should follow your own advice there
> > >
> > >I don't edit my opponent's replies to suit my argument
> > >or make posts using their identities. Those antics belong
> > >to the anti side of these animal related groups.
> >
> > I'd say neither "side" has a monopoly on those antics,
>
> Then give an example where the AR side in these
> animal related groups have forged posts using
> their opponent's identity.
>
>
> > however in this case I interpretted Dutch's response
> > as a barb, and not offered as an accurate description
> > of your grocery list.
>
> I don't care how you interpret it, Swamp. The
> fact is that Dutch edited my reply to a challenge
> he offered from this;
>
> "Fallen apples and mustard cress"
>
> to
>
> "Factory farmed rice, grains, fruits and vegetables
> purchased indiscriminately, coffee, tea, cheese,
> milk and eggs, along with some shit that I have no
> clue about"
>
> That's about as dishonest as you can get.

My post was an obvious poke in the eye, there was nothing dishonest about
it.. Yours was a blatant lie.

> > Your hesitance to reveal the true contents of the list, otoh, suggest
> > you're hiding something.
> >
> I have no desire to discuss my weekly grocery
> lists with the likes of you or Dutch.

Then you should have said, "I respectfully decline to reveal what I eat on
the grounds it may incriminate me."

> My answer
> was irrelevant since I could've insisted I was
> fasting, for instance, and didn't have a grocery
> list to offer.

Yes, being a reflexive liar you could have said almost anything.

> Dutch's editing of my list, whatever
> I chose to put in it, is a dishonest cheat on his
> part and shows his total lack of any honour or
> credibility.

You wish.