Re: Dutch shows his utter dishonesty and a penchant for altering his opponent's comments to suit.

On Sun, 16 Nov 2003 12:05:08 GMT, "Ipse dixit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

>
>"rick etter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> "Ipse dixit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > >
>> > > Even if your position could get any weaker, that
>> > > wouldn't have done it. It was obvious, it was never
>> > > intended to be anything but an obvious taking the
>> > > piss and you know it.
>> > >
>> > That's very easy to say after been shown your
>> > dishonesty, and I remember that Jonathan and
>> > Kevin tried a similar excuse to yours after being
>> > caught while forging posts using their opponent's
>> > identity. There is no excuse for editing your
>> > opponent's replies,
>> ========================
>> maybe you should follow your own advice there
>
>I don't edit my opponent's replies to suit my argument
>or make posts using their identities. Those antics belong
>to the anti side of these animal related groups.

I'd say neither "side" has a monopoly on those antics, however in this
case I interpretted Dutch's response as a barb, and not offered as an
accurate description of your grocery list. *If* I'm following the
discussion correctly, neither your claim of "fallen apples and mustard
cress" nor his response of "factory farmed rice, grains, fruits and
vegetables purchased indiscriminately, coffee, tea, cheese,  milk and
eggs, along with some shit that I have no clue about" were meant to be
taken seriously. Tongue-in-cheek remarks aren't lies or dishonesty.

Your hesitance to reveal the true contents of the list, otoh, suggest
you're hiding something.

-- swamp