Re: Dutch shows his utter dishonesty and a penchant for altering his opponent's comments to suit.

"Ipse dixit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "rick etter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > "Ipse dixit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > > Even if your position could get any weaker, that
> > > > wouldn't have done it. It was obvious, it was never
> > > > intended to be anything but an obvious taking the
> > > > piss and you know it.
> > > >
> > > That's very easy to say after been shown your
> > > dishonesty, and I remember that Jonathan and
> > > Kevin tried a similar excuse to yours after being
> > > caught while forging posts using their opponent's
> > > identity. There is no excuse for editing your
> > > opponent's replies,
> > ========================
> > maybe you should follow your own advice there
>
> I don't edit my opponent's replies to suit my argument
> or make posts using their identities. Those antics belong
> to the anti side of these animal related groups.
=====================
Unethical, unannotated snipping is just as deceitful, you ignorant fool.
It's part-n-parcel of thye same thing.  You've been caught, you're a lazy,
ignorant hypocritical killer.

Go have that nice blood-drenched dinner, killer...