Re: Dutch shows his utter dishonesty and a penchant for altering his opponent's comments to suit.

"Dutch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Ipse dixit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > "swamp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 19:43:18 GMT, "Ipse dixit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >"Dutch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >> "Ipse dixit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >> > "Dutch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >> > > "Ipse dixit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >> > > > "Dutch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >> > > > > "Ipse dixit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL 
> > > >> > > > > PROTECTED]
> > > >> > > > > > On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 11:35:22 -0800, "Dutch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> > > >> > > > > > wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > >"Ipse dixit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> > > >> > > > > > >> On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 09:27:09 -0800, "Dutch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> > > >> > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > >> >"Ipse dixit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> > > >> > > > > > >> >> On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 17:32:45 -0800, "Dutch" <[EMAIL 
> > > >> > > > > > >> >> PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > I challenge you to post your typical weekly grocery
> > > >> > > > > > > list here.
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > Factory farmed rice, grains, fruits and vegetables
> > > >> > > > > > purchased indiscriminately, coffee, tea, cheese,
> > > >> > > > > > milk and eggs, along with some shit that I have no
> > > >> > > > > > clue about.
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > You have dishonestly included a list of items I don't eat
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > You lied about what you eat.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > You have no way of knowing that,
> > > >>
> > > >> I know your grocery list is not comprised of fallen apples
> > > >> and mustard cress.
> > > >
> > > >Whether you believe my answer or not is no excuse for
> > > >dishonestly editing it to include a of list non-vegan food.
> > >
> > > Sidebar:
> > >
> > > *If* you believed the farmer/rancher were the morally culpable
> > > "free-agent" as you claim, you'd have no concern about what others
> > > think you eat.
> > >
> > This is irrelevant to my complaint about Dutch's editing
> > of my replies to include non-vegan foods. He has no
> > excuse for using dishonest tactics to help weaken his
> > opponent's position in this way.
>
> Even if your position could get any weaker, that wouldn't have done it. It
> was obvious, it was never intended to be anything but an obvious taking the
> piss and you know it.
>
That's very easy to say after been shown your
dishonesty, and I remember that Jonathan and
Kevin tried a similar excuse to yours after being
caught while forging posts using their opponent's
identity. There is no excuse for editing your
opponent's replies, in the same way that there is
no excuse to forge posts using an apponent's
identity. You're all as dishonest as each other.