Re: pearl's list update

"usual suspect" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> farrell77 wrote:
> >>Sophist Bob crawled out from under his rock and wrote:
> >
> > Can't you be more than Jon's sycophant and come up with
> > something original?  Or better yet, reject name-calling
> > altogether?  At least you could appear to be your own
> > person, rather than his weak-minded, weak-willed lapdog.
>
> I think my posts show I'm my own man. ...

We disagree at this point, but I'm open to changing my opinion.


> ...I'll make a deal with you: I'll
> reject name-calling when you fight your own battles rather than trying
> to stick up for others OR simply interjecting threads with insults and
> your own name-calling.

Deal on the name-calling and I'll do my best to live up to it, as
far as discussions with you are concerned.  Will you consider
applying this to others too?

That said, I have to dispute your claim that I'm not fighting my own
battles (what a strange choice of words!).  This is an open, public forum
where any "battle" belongs to anyone who chooses to participate.
As it turns out, the libertarian / AR discussion is one that holds
particular interest to me.


> >>There are only a few which she disputes. In fact, she agreed the list is
> >>56.25% correct.
> >
> > If it's only a little more than half right, why are you posting it?
>
> No, SHE has agreed it's mostly correct. *I* submit it's fully accurate.

I doubt it, but we'll see when you post your evidence.

[...]