Re: pearl's list update

farrell77 wrote:
> > Sophist Bob crawled out from under his rock and wrote:
>
> Can't you be more than Jon's sycophant and come up with
> something original?  Or better yet, reject name-calling
> altogether?  At least you could appear to be your own
> person, rather than his weak-minded, weak-willed lapdog.

I think my posts show I'm my own man. I'll make a deal with you: I'll 
reject name-calling when you fight your own battles rather than trying 
to stick up for others OR simply interjecting threads with insults and 
your own name-calling.

<...>
> > There are only a few which she disputes. In fact, she agreed the list is
> > 56.25% correct.
>
> If it's only a little more than half right, why are you posting it?

No, SHE has agreed it's mostly correct. *I* submit it's fully accurate.

> > > She's asked repeatedly.
> >
> > No, she's *complained* repeatedly.
>
> She's asked.

Complained.

> > > Why haven't you provided that?
> >
> > I told her she'd have to wait for the next rainy weekend. We got some
> > rain last weekend (first rainy weekend in a long time), but not enough
> > to be a washout. We have a 50% chance of rain on Sunday, so her wish may
> > come true.
>
> Yeah, right.  You wouldn't even be saying that you're
> considering it this weekend, if I hadn't mentioned it.

Bullshit. Take a look at Austin's weather history for the last few 
months and tell me when I could've done it (aside from late Sept to 
early Oct when I was on vacation). The offer has *always* been for a 
rainy weekend.

> I know this by observing your behavior here. 

Cyber-stalker.

> See Jon
> if you have any doubts about the reliability and
> persuasiveness of this "argument."

Go back and review the times the little skag has complained. You'll find 
that I've offered to do it on a rainy weekend.