Re: pearl's list update

farrell77 wrote:

> "usual suspect" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > Sophist Bob crawled out from under his rock and wrote:
>
>
> Can't you be more than Jon's sycophant and come up with
> something original?  Or better yet, reject name-calling
> altogether?  At least you could appear to be your own
> person, rather than his weak-minded, weak-willed lapdog.

He is no one's sycophant or lapdog.

> > > > > Lesley (aka pearl, Lotus, lilweed, etc.) believes that a controlled
> > > > > explosion brought down the WTC buildings on 11 September 2001, so it's
> > > > > time to update the list of her loony thoughts. In addition to adding
>
> her
>
> > > > > peculiar crackpot ideas on 9-11, I'm also adding the general point that
> > > > > she gets her "news" from Jeff Rense's website. What a ditz.
> > >
> > > In order not to be seen as a crackpot yourself, you need to
> > > provide evidence (such as specific quotes from her) supporting
> > > each one of these.
> >
> > There are only a few which she disputes. In fact, she agreed the list is
> > 56.25% correct.
>
>
> If it's only a little more than half right, why are you posting it?

Bad observation again, dummy.  It isn't only a little 
more than half right; a little more than half is what 
the stupid HIV-infected whore Lesley *agreed* is right.

You see, Boob?  You aren't observant.

> > > She's asked repeatedly.
> >
> > No, she's *complained* repeatedly.
>
>
> She's asked.

She has complained.

> > > Why haven't you provided that?
> >
> > I told her she'd have to wait for the next rainy weekend. We got some
> > rain last weekend (first rainy weekend in a long time), but not enough
> > to be a washout. We have a 50% chance of rain on Sunday, so her wish may
> > come true.
>
>
> Yeah, right.

Yes.  Right.

> You wouldn't even be saying that you're
> considering it this weekend, if I hadn't mentioned it.

Mind reading again, Boob.  You see?  You fundamentally 
don't get the distinction.  You (think you) mind-read; 
I observe.

> I know this by observing your behavior here.

No, you don't.  Clearly, you do not.  You are 
fundamentally unobservant, as well as a shitbag.  See 
above for proof.