Re: pearl's list update

"usual suspect" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sophist Bob crawled out from under his rock and wrote:

Can't you be more than Jon's sycophant and come up with
something original?  Or better yet, reject name-calling
altogether?  At least you could appear to be your own
person, rather than his weak-minded, weak-willed lapdog.



> >>>Lesley (aka pearl, Lotus, lilweed, etc.) believes that a controlled
> >>>explosion brought down the WTC buildings on 11 September 2001, so it's
> >>>time to update the list of her loony thoughts. In addition to adding
her
> >>>peculiar crackpot ideas on 9-11, I'm also adding the general point that
> >>>she gets her "news" from Jeff Rense's website. What a ditz.
> >
> > In order not to be seen as a crackpot yourself, you need to
> > provide evidence (such as specific quotes from her) supporting
> > each one of these.
>
> There are only a few which she disputes. In fact, she agreed the list is
> 56.25% correct.

If it's only a little more than half right, why are you posting it?


> > She's asked repeatedly.
>
> No, she's *complained* repeatedly.

She's asked.


> > Why haven't you provided that?
>
> I told her she'd have to wait for the next rainy weekend. We got some
> rain last weekend (first rainy weekend in a long time), but not enough
> to be a washout. We have a 50% chance of rain on Sunday, so her wish may
> come true.

Yeah, right.  You wouldn't even be saying that you're
considering it this weekend, if I hadn't mentioned it.

I know this by observing your behavior here.  See Jon
if you have any doubts about the reliability and
persuasiveness of this "argument."



> <snip>
>