
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
Response to some rather dense person's posting. There IS a difference. There is NO hypocrisy in condemning those who do MORE cruelty to animals or advance harm to their bodies or society through drug use -- NOT less. This is what makes Rush Limbaugh a TOTAL hypocrite. He condemned pot smokers, even those whose pot smoking caused no damage to themselves and cost insurers and drug rehab units, demanding extremist prison sentences for them, who did less damage to society financially than his coked up fanatic drug habit. He even condemned those who themselves took no illegal drugs, just because they believed in legalizing drugs for others. Thus, he condemned those who are 100% pure, drug-wise. I have not heard of this Karen Winter, but from what you describe, she kills FAR fewer animals, and those she does, more humanely, than ANYone she condemns. More importantly, she is working in the right direction, willing to work with others to find out ways to further reduce killing animals by advancing technology. Obviously you would condemn WWII veterans for being hypocrites because some of them killed innocent civilians accidentally in war while they were trying to fight the Nazis.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |