
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
> COLLATERAL DEATHS > > Many vegetarians believe that, because they do not eat > meat, no animals die to feed them. Animals do not die to feed vegetarians. They die to help increase profits for farmers..Vegatables can be and are grown without causing any deaths at all. > Unfortunately, this is > rarely if ever true. Anyone who eats food that is grown > using mechanical plows and harvesting machines must > accept partial responsibility for the large numbers (no > hard figures are available) Then why did you claim the numbers are "large"? They may be very small. > of animals who die beneath or > within these machines, or who die from pesticide and > chemical fertilizer poisoning. So you keep saying, but you've never explained why, despite my asking you several times now. Why do you claim to believe animals have rights while at the same time knowingly being responsible for and causal to the mass violations of these rights? For example, if I knew without any doubt that my actions were responsible for violating the rights of animals or humans, I would be morally bound to stop whatever I was doing that causes that harm. You apparently refuse to stop causing these harms, even though you claim to believe your victims have a right not to be intentionally harmed by you for personal gains, so why don't you explain this hypocrisy? After all, if you're insisting we're all as hypocritical as you are, the polite thing to do is to explain why. Now, if you were to take your own advice and begin your claim by saying, " I believe.....", or, "I understand that....", then your wild assertion that everyone must adopt your philosophy and accept responsibility for these deaths caused by farmers might be taken a little more seriously.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |