Re: Dreck unsuccessfully tries to wriggle off the hook

"Jonathan Ball" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Derek wrote:
> > "Jonathan Ball" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>Derek wrote:
> >>>"Jonathan Ball" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>Derek wrote:
> >>>>>"Bill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>Your rotten explanation for your appalling
> >>>>>>inconsistency stinks.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>Killing animals for meat, and thoughtlessly killing
> >>>>>>them collaterally in the course of vegetable
> >>>>>>production, *both* reflect a failure or refusal to
> >>>>>>recognize what you claim is their intrinsic worth.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>No. It only proves that the farmer ignores the
> >>>>>inherent rights of his victims.
> >>>>
> >>>>He ignores them because you keep paying him to ignore them.
> >>>
> >>>If that is his reason for ignoring the rights of his victims,
> >>>then he is even more unethical than I first thought.
> >>
> >>He isn't ignoring any rights of victims.
> >
> > But you just wrote that he does; "He ignores them because
> > you keep paying him to ignore them." Make up your mind.
>
> He ignores what you disingenuously claim, for
> unprincipled reasons, to be animals' "rights".

And now you're back to saying he ignores them again.
Make up your mind.