
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
Interaction? With what?
With other animals.
No evidence of that.
I accept that tiny is a relative term, but what the hell would you call tiny?
Anything forbidding freedom of movement, which is the broad charge leveled by ARAs despite the fact that very few veal producers use such tiny crates.
A fence forbids movement.
These are typical veal calf conditions according to the AR terrorists and propagandists: http://tinyurl.com/lvqv http://tinyurl.com/lvr1
They are the sort of crates being used in Europe. In fact, it looks like they're still being used in the US.
Not on a wide-scale, if at all.
Have you the evidence for that claim?
Are veal calves kept in crates?
Far from the four-sided "crate" portrayed by some activist
groups, modern veal stalls are designed to partition the animals
only up to the shoulder level, ensuring calves visual and
physical interaction with their neighbors. Individual housing
allows animals to receive their own feed, individual care and
attention. Most importantly, individual housing stalls have been
shown to help prevent the spread of disease by minimizing
calf-to-calf contact. Calves can comfortably lay in a natural
position, stand up and groom themselves.
http://www.vealusa.com/info/faq.htmlTry this:
http://www.noveal.org/wi_photos.htm
"Recent" is as relative as "tiny." There's no date on the page. That's consistent with other ARA claims and materials showing the tiny wooden crates in all their current literature. Why would groups resort to showing conditions used 30 years ago when the industry has made significant changes?
http://www.vegetarianimage.com/Photos.htm
No cramped cages there.
Are you blind?
http://tinyurl.com/lvod
From the article itself, we find that this is a picture (one of four inthe article itself) of study conditions. Here's the link. You can find out what was being studied yourself: http://www.nal.usda.gov/awic/newsletters/v7n3/7n3morro.htm
Try to be a little less shady with sources next time.
Not shady. I posted as PICTURES of tiny crates, not a full study.
The STUDY was entitled "Environmental Enrichment of Dairy Calves and Pigs." The STUDY looked at behaviors in relation to items put in the pens to stimulate the calves as well as biological responses (e.g., immunological) of calves that had more stimuli. It's more than disingenuous of you to paste in a picture and suggest it represents *industry* standards when in fact it's from a *limited* study.
http://tinyurl.com/lvoh
How about a link to the full story? Hard to trace it back with a link to one image, especially when the directory listing is denied.
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/72540_dairy30.shtml
Caption from picture: "Larry Stap, a dairy farmer in Lynden, Whatcom County, moves a calf from the hutch where SHE spent her first two months TO A PEN WITH OTHER CALVES" (my emphasis). Note that she's not being raised for veal. She's going into dairy production.
http://www.osseoplastics.com/hutches.htm
What's wrong with that? It's not a darkened, teeny-tiny wooden crate like AR terrorists and propagandists claim.
It's designed to be used inside. It's a tiny PLASTIC crate.
Not tiny.
You're slightly mad.
whyBullshit. The fishing industry wants sustainability and profits. What good is a profit today if there's no chance of one tomorrow? That'sTothe fishing industry is working for sustainable practices.
Crap. Some fishermen what sustainability. Some what whatever they can
get.
ALL fishermen want sustainability. Why would they be in and remain in an industry, making large investments in capital (boats, nets, etc.) and labor, if they faced *no* future in it?
They invest in more capital to catch what *remains* of the fish stocks.maintain their income in the face of a dwindling fish population.
That makes no sense, Zakhar. Not economically, not rationally, not in any manner.
Good - you're learning.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |